Review of MyIMG AI

MyIMG AI scored 7.2/10 in our test of 22 August 2026. It is an online NSFW tool inside the multi-tool platform myimg.ai: it runs in a desktop or mobile browser and hands automatic credits to every new visitor.

Lawful use only with your own photos, or photos of adults who have given explicit consent. Responsible AI (in Spanish).

Every figure above comes from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Prices change without notice, and the date is what makes the number readable.

Privacy and security (30%)

It can be tried without creating an account, which limits data exposure during the trial. The provider states encryption and automatic deletion, though the period differs between sections.

Output quality (25%)

With well-lit frontal photographs the result is correct and stable, in line with the catalogue average, and the selection brush allows corrections without regenerating everything.

Price and free tier (20%)

The free tier without registration is real and activates on arrival, although the page documents neither how many credits it includes nor how many generations it permits.

Speed (15%)

The page states 5 to 15 seconds per image and our session confirmed it with short queues. The premium plans claim faster processing without publishing figures.

Support and transparency (10%)

The platform publishes visible responsible-use guidance — own material or explicit consent only — and a reasonable help section. Against it: no amounts and no company information.

The five weights are fixed across the whole catalogue and are set out in how we review. A tool is never marked against a rival, only against the same scale.

On 22/08/2026 the desk read the provider’s publicly visible pricing, payment and help pages, recorded every amount and limit into the table above, and ran the service through the same standardised scenarios used across the catalogue: well-lit frontal photographs at medium and high resolution, taken from our own test set.

What we record is what the provider states in public and what the interface does in front of us. On the free tier the first line we check is what the provider offers without payment, and here that reads: an online nsfw tool inside the multi-tool platform myimg.ai.

What we do not do: we never test these tools on photographs of third parties, we publish no results from such attempts if they reach us, and we do not estimate figures the provider leaves unpublished. An absence is recorded as an absence, which lowers the mark on the criterion concerned rather than being filled in with a guess.

Prices and limits change without notice. The date beside every figure is what makes it readable, and the desk re-checks the catalogue on a rolling basis — the next verification date will replace the one above.

• Rombach et al., High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models — The diffusion inpainting this class of tool is built on.
• Kirillov et al., Segment Anything — The segmentation approach behind automatic garment masks.
• Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ley Olimpia reforms — The Mexican text on dissemination of intimate content, real or simulated, without consent.
• Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the AI Act — Article 50 sets the disclosure duty for synthetic content.
• StopNCII.org — The international removal route for non-consensual intimate images.
• TAKE IT DOWN Act, S.146 — The United States takedown obligation, relevant where a provider is hosted there.

Prices, limits and retention come from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Technical and legal claims rest on the published work above. Everything else is what the desk observed in its standardised scenarios.