Review of AiNudez

AiNudez scored 9.3/10 in our test of 13 August 2026 and is the catalogue entry that serves Spanish-speaking readers best. It runs on one-off credit packs from $9.99 USD with no auto-renewal, and it publishes a clear cost per action: 15 credits per image according to the provider's own pricing page.

Lawful use only with your own photos, or photos of adults who have given explicit consent. Responsible AI (in Spanish).

Every figure above comes from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Prices change without notice, and the date is what makes the number readable.

Privacy and security (30%)

Sign-up by email and payment in cryptocurrency are both available, which keeps the personal data attached to the account to a minimum. A data policy exists and is reachable; as always, check the deletion periods before uploading anything of your own.

Output quality (25%)

In our standardised scenarios the output held up with well-lit frontal photographs, and the three presets cover different degrees of realism. Short video is competent at 720p, though it consumes far more credits than a still image.

Price and free tier (20%)

There is no published free tier, and that costs points. In exchange, the one-off model is among the most transparent in the catalogue: the cost per image falls from about $0.30 USD on the starter pack to a fraction of a cent on the largest one.

Speed (15%)

Generation times were short and steady throughout the test session, with no queue split by plan: the size of the credit pack changes the volume available, not the speed.

Support and transparency (10%)

The pricing page itemises the cost of every action, which is uncommon in this category, and the terms match between the public page and the checkout. The English-only interface remains the main barrier for Mexican readers.

The five weights are fixed across the whole catalogue and are set out in how we review. A tool is never marked against a rival, only against the same scale.

On 13/08/2026 the desk read the provider’s publicly visible pricing, payment and help pages, recorded every amount and limit into the table above, and ran the service through the same standardised scenarios used across the catalogue: well-lit frontal photographs at medium and high resolution, taken from our own test set.

What we record is what the provider states in public and what the interface does in front of us. On the free tier the first line we check is what the provider offers without payment, and here that reads: not published on the official pricing page on the date of verification.

What we do not do: we never test these tools on photographs of third parties, we publish no results from such attempts if they reach us, and we do not estimate figures the provider leaves unpublished. An absence is recorded as an absence, which lowers the mark on the criterion concerned rather than being filled in with a guess.

Prices and limits change without notice. The date beside every figure is what makes it readable, and the desk re-checks the catalogue on a rolling basis — the next verification date will replace the one above.

• Rombach et al., High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models — The diffusion inpainting this class of tool is built on.
• Kirillov et al., Segment Anything — The segmentation approach behind automatic garment masks.
• Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ley Olimpia reforms — The Mexican text on dissemination of intimate content, real or simulated, without consent.
• Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the AI Act — Article 50 sets the disclosure duty for synthetic content.
• StopNCII.org — The international removal route for non-consensual intimate images.
• TAKE IT DOWN Act, S.146 — The United States takedown obligation, relevant where a provider is hosted there.

Prices, limits and retention come from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Technical and legal claims rest on the published work above. Everything else is what the desk observed in its standardised scenarios.