Review of Undresswith AI

Undresswith AI scored 8.6/10 in our review of 28 August 2026. Its free tier works without creating an account, unlocking HD costs $0.99 USD and requires no sign-in either, and the provider states that images are deleted after 24 hours.

Lawful use only with your own photos, or photos of adults who have given explicit consent. Responsible AI (in Spanish).

Every figure above comes from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Prices change without notice, and the date is what makes the number readable.

Privacy and security (30%)

This is where it comes out best. The service states that images are deleted after 24 hours, a concrete period few competitors publish, and the free tier works without creating an account.

Output quality (25%)

What can be verified is the output policy: the paid plans deliver the result without blur and without a watermark, and HD unlocks for $0.99 USD. The service itself recommends uploading from 1280 px.

Price and free tier (20%)

Initial access is among the cheapest in the category: a free tier with no registration and an HD unlock for less than a dollar, with no subscription needed to take the first step. Pack prices, however, are not public.

Speed (15%)

The service sells a priority queue as a paid advantage, which implies waiting on the free tier. It publishes no average times, and neither do we without measuring under the same conditions.

Support and transparency (10%)

This is the clearest deduction. Prices behind registration and a main payment method under maintenance on the day of the review are two signals of opacity and of a service still under works.

The five weights are fixed across the whole catalogue and are set out in how we review. A tool is never marked against a rival, only against the same scale.

On 28/08/2026 the desk read the provider’s publicly visible pricing, payment and help pages, recorded every amount and limit into the table above, and ran the service through the same standardised scenarios used across the catalogue: well-lit frontal photographs at medium and high resolution, taken from our own test set.

What we record is what the provider states in public and what the interface does in front of us. On the free tier the first line we check is what the provider offers without payment, and here that reads: yes; it works without creating an account.

What we do not do: we never test these tools on photographs of third parties, we publish no results from such attempts if they reach us, and we do not estimate figures the provider leaves unpublished. An absence is recorded as an absence, which lowers the mark on the criterion concerned rather than being filled in with a guess.

Prices and limits change without notice. The date beside every figure is what makes it readable, and the desk re-checks the catalogue on a rolling basis — the next verification date will replace the one above.

• Rombach et al., High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models — The diffusion inpainting this class of tool is built on.
• Kirillov et al., Segment Anything — The segmentation approach behind automatic garment masks.
• Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ley Olimpia reforms — The Mexican text on dissemination of intimate content, real or simulated, without consent.
• Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the AI Act — Article 50 sets the disclosure duty for synthetic content.
• StopNCII.org — The international removal route for non-consensual intimate images.
• TAKE IT DOWN Act, S.146 — The United States takedown obligation, relevant where a provider is hosted there.

Prices, limits and retention come from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Technical and legal claims rest on the published work above. Everything else is what the desk observed in its standardised scenarios.