Review of Deep Nude AI

Deep Nude AI scored 7.8/10 in our test of 21 August 2026. It is not a standalone service but an app inside ai.cc, a multi-tool AI platform with a token system: the free account includes $1 USD in trial tokens.

Lawful use only with your own photos, or photos of adults who have given explicit consent. Responsible AI (in Spanish).

Every figure above comes from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Prices change without notice, and the date is what makes the number readable.

Privacy and security (30%)

Registration is at platform level: a single account and a token balance across dozens of apps. That centralises payment, but the app listing documents no retention policy of its own.

Output quality (25%)

With well-lit frontal photographs the result is correct, in line with the category average, and processing took seconds in our session.

Price and free tier (20%)

The Start pack at $0 with $1 USD in tokens allows a genuinely minimal trial with no card. Beyond that, the jump to $20 USD is the highest entry threshold we recorded.

Speed (15%)

The platform states processing in seconds and our session confirmed it with short queues. There are no documented priority tiers: speed is the same for everyone.

Support and transparency (10%)

The stated 24/7 human support is a point in its favour, uncommon in this category. Against it: documentation specific to the app is minimal and there is no changelog.

The five weights are fixed across the whole catalogue and are set out in how we review. A tool is never marked against a rival, only against the same scale.

On 21/08/2026 the desk read the provider’s publicly visible pricing, payment and help pages, recorded every amount and limit into the table above, and ran the service through the same standardised scenarios used across the catalogue: well-lit frontal photographs at medium and high resolution, taken from our own test set.

What we record is what the provider states in public and what the interface does in front of us. On the free tier the first line we check is what the provider offers without payment, and here that reads: a photo-processing app inside the multi-tool platform ai.cc.

What we do not do: we never test these tools on photographs of third parties, we publish no results from such attempts if they reach us, and we do not estimate figures the provider leaves unpublished. An absence is recorded as an absence, which lowers the mark on the criterion concerned rather than being filled in with a guess.

Prices and limits change without notice. The date beside every figure is what makes it readable, and the desk re-checks the catalogue on a rolling basis — the next verification date will replace the one above.

• Rombach et al., High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models — The diffusion inpainting this class of tool is built on.
• Kirillov et al., Segment Anything — The segmentation approach behind automatic garment masks.
• Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ley Olimpia reforms — The Mexican text on dissemination of intimate content, real or simulated, without consent.
• Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the AI Act — Article 50 sets the disclosure duty for synthetic content.
• StopNCII.org — The international removal route for non-consensual intimate images.
• TAKE IT DOWN Act, S.146 — The United States takedown obligation, relevant where a provider is hosted there.

Prices, limits and retention come from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Technical and legal claims rest on the published work above. Everything else is what the desk observed in its standardised scenarios.