Review of SwapFaces AI

SwapFaces AI scored 8.0/10 in our test of 20 August 2026. It is an AI editing suite built around face swapping in photo and video up to 4K, with undress-style processing on the higher plans.

Lawful use only with your own photos, or photos of adults who have given explicit consent. Responsible AI (in Spanish).

Every figure above comes from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Prices change without notice, and the date is what makes the number readable.

Privacy and security (30%)

The provider states automatic deletion of photos, videos and facial models after 24 hours, with no use for training and no staff access to the content; payment goes through established providers.

Output quality (25%)

Face swapping in photographs is fast and stable with well-lit frontal material, and video reaches 4K with no watermark on the paid plans. Undress-style editing sits behind the higher tiers.

Price and free tier (20%)

The one-off model is among the cleanest in the category: no subscription, credits that do not expire and a 30-day refund for accounts with minimal use. Free credits arrive with a daily sign-in.

Speed (15%)

Photo processing took seconds in our session; the provider cites about 15 seconds on average. Video consumes 3 credits a second, so long clips need planning.

Support and transparency (10%)

There is public documentation of the credit model, a detailed refund policy and standard support channels. Points come off for amounts hidden until checkout.

The five weights are fixed across the whole catalogue and are set out in how we review. A tool is never marked against a rival, only against the same scale.

On 20/08/2026 the desk read the provider’s publicly visible pricing, payment and help pages, recorded every amount and limit into the table above, and ran the service through the same standardised scenarios used across the catalogue: well-lit frontal photographs at medium and high resolution, taken from our own test set.

What we record is what the provider states in public and what the interface does in front of us. On the free tier the first line we check is what the provider offers without payment, and here that reads: an ai editing suite: face swap in photo and video, head swap and processing.

What we do not do: we never test these tools on photographs of third parties, we publish no results from such attempts if they reach us, and we do not estimate figures the provider leaves unpublished. An absence is recorded as an absence, which lowers the mark on the criterion concerned rather than being filled in with a guess.

Prices and limits change without notice. The date beside every figure is what makes it readable, and the desk re-checks the catalogue on a rolling basis — the next verification date will replace the one above.

• Rombach et al., High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models — The diffusion inpainting this class of tool is built on.
• Kirillov et al., Segment Anything — The segmentation approach behind automatic garment masks.
• Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ley Olimpia reforms — The Mexican text on dissemination of intimate content, real or simulated, without consent.
• Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the AI Act — Article 50 sets the disclosure duty for synthetic content.
• StopNCII.org — The international removal route for non-consensual intimate images.
• TAKE IT DOWN Act, S.146 — The United States takedown obligation, relevant where a provider is hosted there.

Prices, limits and retention come from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Technical and legal claims rest on the published work above. Everything else is what the desk observed in its standardised scenarios.