Review of UndressHer

UndressHer scored 8.3/10 in our test of 17 August 2026. The model is simple: one token equals one generation, there is a free token every day with a watermark, and the paid packs, from $14.99 to $49.99 USD, are one-off purchases with no subscription.

Lawful use only with your own photos, or photos of adults who have given explicit consent. Responsible AI (in Spanish).

Every figure above comes from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Prices change without notice, and the date is what makes the number readable.

Privacy and security (30%)

Sign-up by email and a one-off payment that keeps no subscription relationship with the account. The data policy is sound though brief; as always, check the deletion periods first.

Output quality (25%)

With well-lit photographs and the right preset the results are correct, and the Ultimate pack unlocks the highest quality. On the free tier the output arrives watermarked and at basic quality.

Price and free tier (20%)

The free daily token is a real gesture but not enough for regular use, and the small pack works out expensive per image. The scale improves quickly: Premium lands at about $0.25 and Ultimate at about $0.10.

Speed (15%)

The standard queue adds moderate waits; the Premium and Ultimate packs switch on the fast queue, which answered in seconds in our session.

Support and transparency (10%)

Public prices and a model that is easy to understand. The legal documentation is thinner than that of the leaders and support answers only by form: a moderate deduction.

The five weights are fixed across the whole catalogue and are set out in how we review. A tool is never marked against a rival, only against the same scale.

On 17/08/2026 the desk read the provider’s publicly visible pricing, payment and help pages, recorded every amount and limit into the table above, and ran the service through the same standardised scenarios used across the catalogue: well-lit frontal photographs at medium and high resolution, taken from our own test set.

What we record is what the provider states in public and what the interface does in front of us. On the free tier the first line we check is what the provider offers without payment, and here that reads: 1 token a day, one image, watermarked and at basic quality.

What we do not do: we never test these tools on photographs of third parties, we publish no results from such attempts if they reach us, and we do not estimate figures the provider leaves unpublished. An absence is recorded as an absence, which lowers the mark on the criterion concerned rather than being filled in with a guess.

Prices and limits change without notice. The date beside every figure is what makes it readable, and the desk re-checks the catalogue on a rolling basis — the next verification date will replace the one above.

• Rombach et al., High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models — The diffusion inpainting this class of tool is built on.
• Kirillov et al., Segment Anything — The segmentation approach behind automatic garment masks.
• Diario Oficial de la Federación, Ley Olimpia reforms — The Mexican text on dissemination of intimate content, real or simulated, without consent.
• Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the AI Act — Article 50 sets the disclosure duty for synthetic content.
• StopNCII.org — The international removal route for non-consensual intimate images.
• TAKE IT DOWN Act, S.146 — The United States takedown obligation, relevant where a provider is hosted there.

Prices, limits and retention come from the provider’s own public pages on the date of the test. Technical and legal claims rest on the published work above. Everything else is what the desk observed in its standardised scenarios.